National Milk Producers’ Federation CEO and President Jim Mulhern is skeptical that Congress will be able to tackle immigration reform, child nutrition programs, or the Trans-Pacific Partnership Agreement before or right after the elections in November. Politico’s Morning Agriculture report says lawmakers will be mostly focusing on funding the government. Mulhern said these three issues are policy priorities for the dairy producers and they’re focusing on them right now. When it comes to child nutrition, the dairy industry is hoping Congress will once again allow schools to offer flavored 1 percent milk. Currently, those offerings must be fat free and that’s led to lower consumption and overall student participation in the program.
From the National Association of Farm Broadcasting news service.
Congress has returned to Washington from its summer recess for a brief period to work on the federal budget, before leaving Capitol Hill by the end of the month to campaign for the November elections. Also left behind will be a number of important policy items that remain the focus of NMPF – and which we’ll continue to push hard for action on, even if it means it will be 2017 before they can be addressed in earnest.
Congress is also likely to assemble in a lame-duck session after the November elections, but apart from a focus on annual spending matters, it doesn’t currently appear there is much momentum behind addressing many of the other major challenges facing the country. That said, we are having ongoing discussions with lawmakers about how important it is to dairy farmers that work continue on our list of priorities, whether yet in 2016, or in 2017 when a new Congress convenes. Here are a few of those key issues:
Immigration reform. Much has been said on the campaign trail this year about our nation’s immigration laws, but not much helpful or hopeful light has been shed on the subject. Despite the rhetoric, the fact remains that we have a serious mismatch between the supply of workers available to farming and agriculture, and the labor demand on dairy farms, orchards, nurseries, meat packing plants, and other places where much of the hard work wouldn’t get done without immigrant workers. Whoever is in the White House in January – and whoever controls the Senate and House next year – must make it a priority to address our labor situation, and a key piece of it is immigration policy reform that provides viable answers for agriculture’s labor needs. Any future solution needs to ensure an adequate, productive and competitive farm workforce, while also dealing with undocumented workers who are already here. The dairy sector, as well as much of the rest of agriculture and the larger U.S. business community, will be pushing for a constructive resolution of this issue after two decades of inaction.
The Trans-Pacific Partnership. Another hot topic in this year’s campaign, and ironically an issue where both Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton appear to find common ground, is the impact of trade agreements on growing our economy. Trade deals are always a mixed bag and, like all negotiations, they involve compromises. But in the case of the Trans-Pacific Partnership, contrary to the views of the White House aspirants, we would be better off with it in place. The U.S. government has spent five years negotiating the TPP, and it’s now up to Congress to vote it up or down. But delaying consideration of the deal, or voting against it, would reduce our opportunities to capture growing dairy markets in the Pacific Rim. The TPP isn’t perfect, and we have been clear that implementation of it must be carefully monitored and its provisions must be strictly enforced. But punting on the TPP is a serious mistake and would greatly reduce opportunities for increased access to overseas dairy markets that are growing faster than our own.
Child nutrition and the school lunch program. The re-authorization by Congress of the policies that govern our school lunch program is supposed to be an every-five-years’ event, and one that was to have been completed last year. After some positive momentum by both the House and Senate in 2016, however, the process has bogged down – meaning this also may be an issue that gets pushed into 2017. One important reason we need action here is because the pending nutrition bill would rectify a misguided policy that eliminated the ability of schools to offer flavored, 1 percent milk. Right now, only 1 percent white milk is allowed by USDA in schools – and any flavored milk must be fat-free. That restriction has reduced overall school milk consumption, and for that matter, student participation in the entire school lunch program. The re-authorization of the child nutrition act would change this situation for the better, but it remains hung up in both chambers. That logjam needs to be broken next year, if not this year.