usda

USDA Proposes Revisions to Genetic Engineering Policy

Dan Genetically Modified, Legislative 24 Comments

usda
The U.S. Department of Agriculture’s (USDA) Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service is proposing to revise regulations (7 CFR Part 340) regarding the importation, interstate movement and environmental release of certain genetically engineered organisms. The update to the regulations is in response to advances in genetic engineering and the accumulated experience in implementing the current regulations, as well as to reduce the burden on regulated entities. This is the first comprehensive revision of the regulations since they were established in 1987. The proposed rule is open for a 120-day comment period from January 19, 2017 until May 19, 2017 on Regulations.gov.

In an exclusive Q&A interview with Andy LaVigne, president and CEO of the American Seed Trade Association, he explained what the proposal means for the American agricultural industry.

Q: So this is the first major revision of the regulations since they were established in 1987. What are your thoughts on the changes that were proposed?

A: Well, we are still working through the proposal itself. There are a number of things that we want to make sure are addressed dealing with Part 340 in the whole review and deregulation process that the USDA goes through with respect to the biotech traits in the marketplace. There are also provisions in there that deal with plant breeding innovation and plant breeding techniques. That is an area we have the most interest in this time. We think that the proposal that they came up with is very beneficial to the seed industry and the breeding community, and that’s an area we are very pleased with the results that we saw.

Q: Out of the 122 pages of the revision, what major revisions effect the American agriculture industry?

A: The main area is that they look at gene editing techniques for plant breeding. In the document, they talk about how you can use gene editing techniques for both creating new biotech traits and placing them in crop varieties, or you can use gene editing techniques to develop new varieties. In their proposal, they are proposing to exclude those kinds of gene editing techniques used to create new plant varieties. And so for us, that’s very important because it’s very similar to the processes that we use today with our current breeding techniques to develop new varieties and bring them to the marketplace.

Q: What key factors prompted this revision, and when did it all begin?

A: There’s a number of things. They’ve been working on this actually for well over 10 years. Under the Bush administration, they proposed changes to Part 340 right at the end of that administration. And they were sitting in the department for the last eight years, and the department finally told them and started the process of review again. During that time is when breeding techniques evolved, and this opportunity to use gene editing came into play. So that’s why this is addressed in the proposal that came out of the USDA this time versus back under the Bush administration. It really is just an evolution of what’s happening in the industry that’s trying to get their regulations up to date and potentially looking into the future.

Another key area that we’re working with the administration on is to ensure that they’re talking with our trading partners, and that policy development in other countries, as well as in the U.S., is consistent across the board so that there’s not a negative impact on the movement of agricultural products globally that may be produced from gene editing techniques. So our main goal is to make sure that consistency across the board is there for all products in the marketplace and that there is not any negative impact on the movement because of a certain technique being used.

Q: What is the approval process for the revision?

A: These processes are always somewhat fluid, especially when done right at the transition from one administration to another. Our anticipation is that they’ll review all regulations that have been proposed. So this will also get a review from the administration. There’s a possibility it can get pulled back, revised and put back out. There’s a possibility they can go through the 120-day comment period and extend the comment period to provide people additional time. So there’s a number of various factors that can come into play. This is obviously the first step of several that will come in the future, and we’ll have to see really what the next two to three months hold with the new administration coming in.

Comments 24

  1. F*ckin’ tremendous issues here. I am very happy to look your post. Thank you so much and i’m looking forward to touch you. Will you please drop me a mail?

  2. Thank you for any other great article. Where else may anyone get that type of information in such a perfect way of writing? I have a presentation subsequent week, and I am on the look for such info.

  3. Howdy! I could have sworn I’ve been to this website before but after reading through some of the post I realized it’s new to me. Anyways, I’m definitely happy I found it and I’ll be book-marking and checking back frequently!

  4. What i don’t realize is if truth be told how you are not actually a lot more neatly-favored than you may be right now. You’re so intelligent. You know thus significantly with regards to this topic, made me individually believe it from numerous numerous angles. Its like women and men are not fascinated until it is one thing to do with Woman gaga! Your personal stuffs great. All the time take care of it up!

  5. Excellent goods from you, man. I have have in mind your stuff prior to and you’re simply extremely great. I actually like what you have acquired here, certainly like what you’re saying and the way in which wherein you assert it. You’re making it entertaining and you continue to care for to keep it wise. I can’t wait to read far more from you. This is really a great site.

  6. Wonderful beat ! I wish to apprentice while you amend your web site, how can i subscribe for a blog site? The account helped me a acceptable deal. I had been a little bit acquainted of this your broadcast provided bright clear concept

  7. We’re a group of volunteers and opening a new scheme in our community. Your site provided us with valuable info to work on. You’ve done a formidable job and our whole community will be grateful to you.

  8. Wonderful web site. Plenty of helpful info here. I am sending it to some friends ans also sharing in delicious. And certainly, thanks for your effort!

  9. hi!,I like your writing so much! share we communicate more about your post on AOL? I require an expert on this area to solve my problem. Maybe that’s you! Looking forward to see you.

  10. I’m impressed, I need to say. Really rarely do I encounter a blog that’s each educative and entertaining, and let me inform you, you may have hit the nail on the head. Your concept is outstanding; the difficulty is one thing that not sufficient people are talking intelligently about. I am very comfortable that I stumbled across this in my search for one thing referring to this.

  11. Hi, Neat post. There’s an issue with your web site in internet explorer, could check this… IE still is the market chief and a good component to people will pass over your wonderful writing due to this problem.

  12. Hi! I just wanted to ask if you ever have any issues with hackers? My last blog (wordpress) was hacked and I ended up losing months of hard work due to no back up. Do you have any solutions to stop hackers?

  13. I’m really enjoying the design and layout of your blog. It’s a very easy on the eyes which makes it much more pleasant for me to come here and visit more often. Did you hire out a developer to create your theme? Excellent work!

  14. I’m so happy to read this. This is the type of manual that needs to be given and not the accidental misinformation that is at the other blogs. Appreciate your sharing this greatest doc.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.